Watching Karanka’s press conference yesterday he appeared in confident mood ahead of the trip to Stoke and there was little sign of a man under pressure – he actually made the point that he sets the example to his players by walking with his head up and showing belief in what they are doing.
His reflection on the Palace game was that it was simply an aberration brought on by the last minute news from the Team Doctor that Friend was not available and thus ruining the week’s game preparation – no doubt his mentor would have offered more severe treatment to such an oversight from a member of his medical team.
Though why Karanka thought it was better to completely change the shape of the team rather than use a makeshift full-back remains unanswered. Interesting when quizzed over why Husband didn’t get the shout his reply was basically he was not up to dealing with Townsend and it would have been an ‘excuse’ to select him – though how the player takes that damning assessment is anyone’s guess.
There is often a degree of news management with Karanka when quizzed about Boro’s current position in the table and where we may expect to finish. According to the boss “We are in the position I thought we would be” – so the bar he has set is 17th place and that is the message he wants to get across.
Though is this our realistic position and are we meeting expectations? I had a quick check yesterday on where promoted clubs finish in their first season – it’s not usually as low as 17th for two-thirds of the newly arrived teams as the average finish is actually 15th – with many clubs finishing comfortably in mid-table and only one of the three promoted teams actually ending up being relegated. So whilst a promoted club would happily snap your hand off for 17th spot before the season started it’s not, or it should not be the measure or the target to aspire to.
Below is a table showing the finishing positions of the promoted teams in the seven seasons Boro were out of the Premier League.
| Season | Promoted Teams (Position finished) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Birmingham (9) | Wolves (15) | Burnley (18) |
| 2010-11 | West Brom (11) | Newcastle (12) | Blackpool (18) |
| 2011-12 | Swansea (11) | Norwich (12) | QPR (17) |
| 2012-13 | West Ham (10) | Southampton (14) | Reading (19) |
| 2013-14 | Palace (11) | Hull (16) | Cardiff (20) |
| 2014-15 | Leicester (14) | Burnley (19) | QPR (20) |
| 2015-16 | Watford (13) | Bournemouth (16) | Norwich (19) |
I defy any manager (even those prone to control freakery) to be able to finesse one position above the relegation zone – in fact even Karanka mentioned that Boro could have had 32 points based on performances, which could be interpreted as we’ve either under-achieved or were the victim of unforeseen bad luck – though he may be right, I can probably think of five draws that Boro could on another day quite easily have won: Stoke (H), West Brom (H), Burnley (A), Leicester (A), West Ham (A).
So in some ways he’s saying we are where he thought we would be, but at the same time countering that by claiming an extra ten points would have been a fairer reflection, which could be an attempt to move the jelly-like goalposts away from those holding the hammer as they try to nail them in place. Though this type of duality is often what you tend to get with Karanka (and perhaps he’s not alone in the art of spin among managers) – it’s painting the picture in shades of grey to avoid having his hands tied by his record, though I’ll leave it to others to determine just how many shades of grey are permissible before the relegation watershed.
The Boro boss is also good at deflecting a seemingly critical point about being overly defensive and turning it with a straight face into a compliment – “we are in this position because we have a good balance between our defence and scoring goals”. There seems to be little acknowledgement to questions posed of how Boro can change in order to improve our goals-for record and he dismisses the idea of needing to change by just reiterating “we must continue to work hard” – he’s in no doubt that he and his team are working hard (which no doubt they are) and “they will fight until the last day” – though thankfully no mention of beaches.
However, in an article in the Telegraph yesterday he is quoted on the same subject of addressing the lack of goals with “There are things we are trying to do… For two or three weeks, we’ve been training to play quicker and doing exercises on the pitch to get the ball to the box quicker and to get more players into the box. But when you change things from one day to the next, it’s difficult.”
This raises the question of why has it only occurred to the Boro boss in the last couple of weeks that something needed to be done to address the problem of our pedestrian approach to scoring goals – these points have been highlighted for months by pundits and analysts alike so it will not surely have escaped his attention. Maybe someone raised the point in Benidorm after plucking up the courage after secretly downing a Zombie cocktail before an informal pool-side meeting. Perhaps it was Negredo with his lounger 30 yards away from the others who professed to be lonely on his own, which made something twig.
He has also pointed to the improved performances going forward against West Brom and Everton as an indication of his belief that Boro will prevail against their relegation rivals. He said about the game on Saturday “We have to show from the first minute that we want to win… as three points at Stoke is really important” – and that last statement cannot be over emphasised.
To have a good chance of avoiding relegation, Boro have few realistic opportunities left to achieve the four wins that must be regarded as needed at this stage. We still have to play five of the top six in our 11 remaining games after Stoke and although we play four of our relegation rivals, three of those are away (Swansea, Hull, Bournemouth) – plus the rearranged game at home to Sunderland – that leaves two other games where we host Burnley and Southampton.
These run of fixtures are in contrast to Hull and Swansea, who both only have two of the top six to play in their run-ins – plus they have shown in recent weeks that they have found much better form. On top of that Leicester looked back to their former selves post-Ranieri, which means the task facing is Boro beginning to appear less comfortable and surely it must be time to put the emphasis on employing tactics that concentrate on winning key games rather than attempting not to lose them. In addition, the meek performance last week at Palace is even more galling given that they also must play five from the top six and up until that point had no reason to cheer.
Karanka has batted away any suggestion that he has set a target for the number of wins required and insists he only focuses on each game as it comes. But surely that is just rather damp flannel for public consumption as he must have at least privately identified games that Boro need to try and win – especially as he also stated yesterday that the difference between the Championship and the Premier League is that we were capable of beating any team in the second tier but now the gap between the top six and the rest is massive. Which means he believes five of our remaining games are unlikely to lead to three points – leaving a realistic target of winning four from seven.
The good news is that both Friend and Barragan have trained all week with the squad, which should mean Karanka can field near enough his strongest XI. I suspect Ayala will partner Gibson with the looming aerial threat of Crouch and hopefully Friend and Fabio as conventional full-backs. The next question is how many defensive midfielders Boro will deploy – if it really is crunch time then the answer must be two. It could mean 4-2-3-1 and personally I’d play Downing behind Negredo and Gaston on the left, primarily because the Uruguayan has more pace for the counter attack. We should start with Negredo up top and surely Adama on the right. Who will be the midfield two? Leadbitter would drive the team forward and perhaps Clayton will want to celebrate his new contract.
Make no mistake this is probably the most important game of the season for Karanka – if Boro fail to turn up like last week then the message to the chairman will be stark. With only two games against both Manchester clubs before the international break, the question must come to mind of whether Karanka’s Boro are capable of winning at least two of those three games in the six days that follow the fortnight off. I’m of the view that Karanka will be unlikely to hang around should we be relegated – so it may well be a short-term decision is the only decision on the table – though I suspect Steve Gibson, despite all the stodge to digest, will not want to to be rude to his regular dining partner and won’t ask the waiter for the bill until he has brought the just desserts menu.
It’s impossible to conceive that Boro won’t be fired up for their visit to the Potteries – the relegation wheel may be turning but I’m not expecting Boro to throw this one as Stoke seemingly have nothing meaningful to play for. Come the full time whistle there will be a sigh of relief and hopefully Gibson won’t be left to ponder whether it’s Karanka who has feet of clay.
OK, as usual give your predictions of team, score and scorers – will it be victory on a fine Wedgewood plate for Boro or will Karanka be looking at a wedgie from the chairman as Boro misfire?